Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Zeiss, by far. p.s. some of my best M9 photos were done at ISO 2000..... On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > It sure looks like they are close in performance and price. It would > depend on whether you like a lug-like grip on the focusing ring, or smaller > grooves. > > There is one "not bad" review on the B&H site that you might like to read. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > > On 9/16/2015 4:23 PM, Kyle Cassidy On The LUG wrote: > >> So I can get a voightlander 50 1.5 in m mount or the zeiss 50mm 2.0. Same >> price. Which would you go with? I'm leaning toward the voightlander for >> the >> extra stop because the m9 is useless above 400..... >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Sent from my iPhone plz excuse the typoss keyb0ard is reaLly small. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto