Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings
From: george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:07:51 -0500
References: <45FDA748-4E3E-47ED-9061-18F2F5A9DF9A@gmail.com> <24ED0840-26C9-499B-B959-DA80D92D0880@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-HEvjA3c8z9pnaHkTZxNbLLsfEM5RyTa-3X3Dy4xLk2xg@mail.gmail.com> <8E0C1550-C9E9-42BF-B055-0683F63D857A@gmail.com>

On Sep 3, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:

> Don't buy a lens for more contrast, less is the way to go. You can always 
> add it if needed.

Unless?
we speak of the "micro contrast" of the lens.
?the ability of the lens to differentiate between areas that are very 
slightly different in color or luminosity. 
?a particular optical property

?not to be confused with sharpness resulting from a combination of factors
including focus, mico-contrast and/or
a number of other possible aberations that can be caused by the lens.

The best optics stand out due to their ability to demonstrate micro contrast 
on film or sensors.

That's when and and why feathers, skin, hair, flower petals, and all
look and feel like feathers, skin, hair, flower petals, and all;
or don't.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 

http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings)
In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the lug) ([Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] The Handmaid's Tale -- More 50mm musings)