Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M240 as Scanner
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 14:48:48 -0700
References: <CA+yJO1A10+JXohgySFDVGY=yM20m=VZhkHvTGUeZ=yGX66p6OQ@mail.gmail.com> <D20B92B1.458AE%mark@rabinergroup.com> <075301d0e4ff$001194d0$0034be70$@mcmaster.fr>

Actually, scanner tech has not been improved much since a decade ago. The
key is that they use single line CCD so there is nothing much they can
improve sensor wise per se. The optic, light source and how flat they can
hold the negs are the important factor.

In any case, yes, the Nikon is still one of the best.

Tina, there is a group of people who are finding the best way to get the
most out of dSLR scanning workflow. You should be able to find them on the
web.

Of course if you have $40K-$50K, you can get the medium format data back
based "film scanner"....



On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:41 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:

> I have not seen anyone say that they out-do the Nikon D8000/9000 or Minolta
> Multi Scan-Pro of over a decade ago.....
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.fr at leica-users.org] On 
> Behalf
> Of
> Mark Rabiner
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2015 11:37 p.m.
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M240 as Scanner
>
> As other options go a quick glance at the B&H site which I'm sure reflects
> a
> dozen other camera stores they are selling 26 different scanners from a
> bunch of different companies. I don't know why on the LUG we seem to be in
> the mindset that the only viable scanners should be Nikons made several
> digital ages ago as if they are relic gems that no one will ever be able to
> match or surpass. Is there any basis for that assumption we can spell out?
> The Nikons were made in the infancy of digital technology. I'm sure the can
> be beat with today's technology and know how.
> These are not toy companies folks.
>
> Plustek OpticFilm 120 Film Scanner $1,849.99 (5300dpi)
> Braun MULTIMAG SlideScan 6000   $1,795.00 (5000 dpi)
> Pacific Image PF120 Pro Multi-Format Film Scanner (3200dpi)  Color Depth:
> 48-bit  $1,399.99
>
>
> On 9/1/15 11:51 AM, "Tina Manley" <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > PESO:
> >
> > My Nikon LS5000 is still broken and I haven't been able to get my
> > Imacon to work yet.  I have several thousand more negatives to scan.
> > This morning I tried using the Fuji X-Pro 1 and a macro lens with my
> > Beseler Slide Duplicator but I couldn't get the autofocus to work at
> > all.  So I got out my M240 and used it with the 100 Macro lens and the
> > EVF.  It's very difficult for me to focus manually but that seems to
> > be the only choice right now!
> >
> > http://www.pbase.com/image/161174100
> >
> > What do you think?  Worth working with or not?
> >
> > Tina
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
// https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto


In reply to: Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] M240 as Scanner)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M240 as Scanner)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] M240 as Scanner)