Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] KIH ER image.....
From: tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:07:19 -0400
References: <93C34050-0F3A-48CA-AD40-995E81C5E1B7@gmail.com> <8B7FF4F3-17AA-41F5-B8AB-F0C83400F972@gmail.com> <94540460-6431-4584-B5FE-996B86F51D8A@gmail.com> <CABmfTOXSDFAJ==ugT9n+9Cs6-K_-o2=zDSJc9w85A--j2BS_ug@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOUBeX_x8fV=9nD9VW5QONZiUe4SxOvkfU4h2vVz1rCD7w@mail.gmail.com> <2B435D03-F413-41FB-BD60-DDFA5F5928FD@gmail.com>

Unless you are trying to sell the image for commercial use, there should be
no problem.  Even editorial use in a magazine or textbook would be fine,
unless you imply something that is pejorative or false.

I love these B&W photos.

Tina

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> > On May 14, 2015, at 10:21 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and by the way, I think the "> I hope this is released." comment was
> intended to convey "I hope you have permission to publish this".  The xray
> could be sufficiently distinctive to identify the person.
>
> thanks Marty, your read is penetrating and it is correct. I will give
> details, of some interest, in a following e-mail.
>
> I am wondering why the question of permission is raised here for a generic
> x ray....especially if you "brought in dozens in Yugoslavia".  This
> question is almost never raised for portraits, which may be "sufficiently
> distinctive to identify the person"  ill or not".
>
>
>
> s
> >
> > M
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Jeebus.  Intubated.  Penetrating head injury.
> >
> > Brought in dozens in Yugoslavia.
> >
> > Marty
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
> > gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 14, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Leowesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Double exposure?  I see more flesh than I would expect on an x Ray?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > flesh is where Leo?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Leo Wesson
> > > leowesson.com
> > >
> > >> On May 14, 2015, at 19:05, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/KIH/skull.jpg.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> so what do you think?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> steve
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Leica Users Group.
> > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] KIH ER image.....)