Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So much for "film is forever"..
From: spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 19:16:35 -0400
References: <D17A7B13.3A40E%mark@rabinergroup.com>

We are going way off topic here so this is my last comment. I did not say to 
store your digital media using microfiche. 

I am aware of a group of digital archivist (including someone from NIST) 
working on how to preserve digital media in a standardized fashion.

Best practice digital media preservation currently require regular active 
copying and indefinite transcription of digital media to protect again 
deterioration of storage media and format obsolescence. 

If you are not doing both, your stored media is likely to stay ephemeral 
despite of what you believe. 

Mark, do as you wish but 1?s magically becomes 0?s in digital media whether 
you believe it?s going to happen or not. Good Luck.

Regards,
Spencer

> On May 14, 2015, at 16:17, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> From the Library of Congress  (USA)
> "Does the Library of Congress recommend microfilming or digitization for
> reformatting institutional collections?....
> 
> " That said, the end of microfilming is near, despite it's relatively low
> cost and the several hundred year projected lifetime of preservation film.
> The National Endowment for the Humanities no longer funds grants for
> microfilming and microfilm readers are increasingly difficult to maintain
> and service."
> 
> http://www.loc.gov/preservation/about/faqs/reformatting.html#prescopy
> 
> Recognizing Digitization as a Preservation Reformatting Method
> http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/links/pdf/preserving/8_34a.pdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/14/15 1:17 AM, "Spencer Cheng" <spencer at aotera.org> wrote:
> 
>> Canadian Archive uses microfiche which are stable for 100+ years (or 
>> acid-free
>> paper for documents). The Canadian census was stored that way. ?was? 
>> because I
>> am not sure we have a real census any more.
> 
> Digital storage is very
>> ephemeral. I doubt if most digital storage will last more than 10 years. 
>> Those
>> 1?s randomly change to 0?s far too frequently. I don?t think archivist 
>> like
>> digital media very much.
>> 
> 
> Regards,
> Spencer
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica
>> Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>> information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] So much for "film is forever"..)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: So much for "film is forever"..)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] So much for "film is forever"..)