Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]we always used to use [IMG] for a pic rather than a general comment about the best developer for a long-discontinued film etc etc ;-) - I still do. I recommend it, second it or whatever. But not everyone wants to comment on every IMG. It doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't worthy of comment, some people may feel unqualified to comment, although that is a rarity on any topic on the LUG ;-) Keep posting here. Peter On 04/05/2015 07:30, Ted Grant wrote: > Your proposal seems fair enough and a quick response method. You have my > "YEA!" VOTE. > Cheers, > ted > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of > Bob Adler > Sent: May-03-15 10:47 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Critiques > > Ok! A second to the motion!! > Any opposed? > :-) > > Bob Adler > Robert Adler Photography > www.robertadlerphotography.com > >> On May 3, 2015, at 10:38 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >>> On May 3, 2015, at 9:39 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Tina et al, >>> I've been wondering about this too: same experience as Tina and others > here I suspect. >>> >>> So I'd like to make a proposal: >>> If you have an image that you really want critiqued here or is something > you believe is an excellent image that you think especially good, put > "IMG:" > as the start of your subject line. >>> >>> So I have to admit that I struggle with the number of posts in our forum. > When I went away for 8 days a bit ago I came back to over 500 emails in the > LUG. >> >> >> >> hmmmm....not a bad idea Bob. I had mixed feelings about all this until > just today. Now I would go for this in an effort to solicit/encourage > serious responses to serious images....What seems curious to me is the > experience of Tina, many others as well as your own report, of insufficient > response to important images, coupled with over 500 emails in a week in > your > LUG mailbox. People seem particularly cautious/reticent about posting to > "social media". There is no such reticence apparant re posting here, so > let's give it a go.... >> >> >>> No way I could possibly open each one and then click on many links to > images. Then open related responses to see if someone provided some > critique > that I may also be able to learn from. Facebook lets you see the image and > click "like". One click, not hundreds. >>> >>> So we use OT, FF, and FS in our subject lines. Can we consider using IMG > for those special images we are particularly proud of or need help with? If > there are other associated images say so and include a link or post them in > a non-IMG post. But I would be MUCH more likely to look at an IMG email > knowing it meant something special to the poster. >>> >>> Just an idea... Curious as to others' thoughts about this. >>> Thanks, >>> Bob >>> >>> Bob Adler >>> Robert Adler Photography >>> www.robertadlerphotography.com >>> >>>> On May 3, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> So what is the answer to getting no response at all from the e-mail > lists? >>>> The reason I post is to get feedback. If I don't get it, there is no >>>> reason to post. When I post on various Facebook pages, Leica ones >>>> especially, I get lots of hits and responses. Why not here? >>>> >>>> Tina >>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am noticing that I get a lot more response and critiques when I post > a >>>>> photo on Facebook in addition to posting it here. I have noticed the > same >>>>> with other regular posters. When they post something on FB there are > many >>>>> views and comments, but posted on the e-mail groups there are no > comments >>>>> at all. Should we stop posting here and just post on FB? >>>>> >>>>> I would hate that but what do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Tina >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Tina Manley >>>>> www.tinamanley.com >>>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com >>>>> >>>>> > http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/ > Tina+Manley.html >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tina Manley >>>> www.tinamanley.com >>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com >>>> > http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/ > Tina+Manley.html >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > . > -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig