Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phenomenal low-light performance at ISO 6400?much better than the MM and just blows away the M240. As he points out, it could be a real boon for f/16, 1/2000-and-be-there daytime street photography as well as available dark. And BTW, where?s Hoppy been recently? My LUG mail has nothing from him in the last month. Did I miss something in one or another of my weeks away from keyboard? ?howard > On Apr 30, 2015, at 7:34 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > > http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2015/04/sensors-and-sensibility/ > > john > > -----Original Message----- > From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On > Behalf Of John McMaster > Sent: Friday, 1 May 2015 9:05 a.m. > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] New Leica Type 246 Monochrom > > Plus commonality for batteries/charger and other accessories with the M, > probably first native (consumer) digital video camera.... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Steve Barbour wrote: > >> what is the cost of the 246 monochrom? how does the quality and cost >> compare to the current Leica monochrome? > > Looks like $7,500 + change. > > Higher ISO > Live View > > both of which I'd welcome. > I've come to love the live view on the M(240) for both my R lenses and my > problematic M lenses > > I've found myself "wishing" for live live view on the M Monochrom > so-o-o--o-o-o-o > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information