Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No Leica M240 or even M9 experience (only M8) but on my Fuji X cameras the speed of the card certainly makes a difference. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator YNWA > On 10 Apr 2015, at 20:52, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I 'm sorry to post this again because I suspect it has been discussed but > inasmuch as neither the LUG Search function nor my internal memory function > are working very well I'll have to. > > I see that Leica suggests Sandisk Ultra or Extreme Class 10 SD cards with > speeds >30 MB/s. http://content.abt.com/documents/54249/LEICAM_FAQ.pdf > > There are some folks on another well known Leica forum who say the speed - > both waking and shooting - is noticeably better with the latest and fastest > cards, which have maximum speeds of 95 MB/s. I have also seen posters in > various forii say they get faster speeds with 16GB cards than they do with > 32GB cards. > > I'm just curious to know if any LUGers have discerned - when shooting with > an M (240) or an M-P (240) - noticeably faster speeds or any other > _noticeable_ advantage to using 60 MB/s versus 95 MB/s SD cards, and also > any _noticeable_ speed difference when using 16GB, 32GB or larger cards. > > Thanks, > > --Bob > > p.s. Uncle Dr. Ted is certainly free to ignore this thread. ;-) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >