Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] XE-1 damn addictive
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:02:36 -0800
References: <59E32364-B27C-4609-A60A-547B0ADE71B9@sfr.fr> <lx3d1p00o07g8Sg01x3eBU> <54CC2B5D.2050000@cox.net>

My D3 series sit neglected the XE-1 is about the exact same size as mu 
OM-3?(which was designed to be the same size as an M)

Addictive little beast
On Jan 30, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Ken Carney wrote:

> Thanks.  Getting ready for another trip and thinking about ordering the 
> 50-140 2.8 to go with my 14 and 35 x lenses, and tired of carting around 
> the Canon L zooms, especially the 70-200 2.8.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> On 1/29/2015 3:03 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
>> http://fujifilmxmount.com/comparison/en/test-our-lenses/
>> 
>> Le 29 janv. 15 ? 21:58, philippe.amard a ?crit :
>> 
>>> You've been warned ;-)
>>> 
>>> fujifilmxmount
>>> 
>>> Philippe
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to 
>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>> NO ARCHIVE
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: for fuji gear addicts only)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] OT: for fuji gear addicts only - LINK :-()