Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Some gearhead guys on Steve Huff's site did that. He couldn't get the M9 skintones out of his M240 files?!! >_o I think some people have too much time,... and money :-) On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > I've got both and use both. When you need higher ISOs, you need the M240. > When you need a quiet shutter, you need the M240. If you want to use R > lenses, you need the M240. Since a lot of the photos I take meet those > requirements, I tend to use the M240 most; however, the M9 is a fine camera > and I like the photos I get from it, sometimes more than the M240 photos, > sometimes not. > > Tina > > T > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > ====On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Scott Gregory <scottgregory at > > mac.com> > > wrote: > > > > As always it's each to their own. I've been reading this week about some > > > people who sold their 240's and went back to M9 due to CCD etc. > > > > > > > > This is interesting. Is there a thread somewhere? M240 images > considered > > too plasticky? > > > > I wonder if there are any low mileage M9s out there now, particularly > such > > as refurbs with factory or other good warranty. > > > > --Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > -- > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > tina-manley.artistwebsites.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits