Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IR
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:36:45 +0200
References: <BF9C9DDB-A438-4989-8555-3DACABB1A46B@threshinc.com> <20A0A716-F5AD-4486-A87E-DA4B84F5B359@icloud.com>

One of the Voigtlander lenses should be fine for this, George. I would 
suggest a 28mm rather than 35mm for this purpose. The M8 works well as an IR 
camera, and if and when I upgrade to something newer, I will keep the M8 
precisely for that purpose.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













On 16 Oct 2014, at 03:43, George Lottermoser <george.imagist at icloud.com> 
wrote:

> Thanks Peter.
> 
> I'm trying to figure out the best inexpensive lens to dedicate my M8 to 
> Infrared, preferably something that will take my existing 46 mm filter.
> 
> Open to ideas?
> thinking a 35 mm
> 
> a note off the iPad, George
> 
> On Oct 15, 2014, at 7:23 PM, Peter Klein <pklein at threshinc.com> wrote:
> 
>> I believe I've been here since the year 2000. I'd been shooting with a 
>> IIIf, and was hoping to get back into the M system after many years 
>> absence. I came for information about what older lenses were still 
>> viable. I stayed for the photography and the great group of people I met.
>> 
>> Rangefinder photography is both a way of seeing and a way of being. That 
>> way has been tied up with Leica for nearly a century. The lenses are 
>> superb, the form factor works beautifully. You know what you've focused 
>> on, and you can see what you shot while you shoot it. I really don't care 
>> about the bling oriented marketing, and I do wish that the prices hadn't 
>> gone stupid bleeping crazy. Fortunately, there is the used market, and 
>> keeping the things you buy for a long time.
>> 
>> Like many, I've worked with other cameras as well. Like the famous Kyle 
>> Cassidy, I learned digital playing with an early Nikon COOLPIX. In recent 
>> years, some shoulder and eye problems made micro 4/3 cameras the line of 
>> least resistance. There's nothing to apologize for ? they are versatile 
>> little beasties, and the lenses, especially the primes, are pretty darn 
>> good.
>> 
>> But there's nothing quite like a Leica.  As you can see from my other 
>> thread today, I'm coming back to my ancient M8 that the glitterati don't 
>> take seriously anymore. And, there's the possibility that I will do 
>> something (financially) stupid bleeping crazy in the foreseeable future. 
>> After all, an M 240 or a Monochrom is less expensive than a little red 
>> sports car. :-) 
>> 
>> --Peter, dictating to my iPad
>> (If it misconstrues, please excuse)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Do you remember why you joined the LUG?)
Message from george.imagist at icloud.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Do you remember why you joined the LUG?)