Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:02:59 +0200
References: <32402C5B-142A-4463-A735-253A4CBFC4A4@gmail.com>

I don?t see much difference, all are excellent.

Un abrazo,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman

Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator

YNWA













On 06 Oct 2014, at 03:25, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X, 
> Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan : 
> 
> Carrer del Correu Vell
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html>
> 
> The Light Way
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html>
> 
> Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted:
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html>
> 
> All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning 
> applied to all.
> 
> In my opinion I can?t say any better quality on film vs MM, except the 
> grain of course, I?ve don?t put it on the MM version, I consider it is 
> artificial. What do you think?
> 
> Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)