Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 00:16:09 -0500
References: <osxM1n00u0AFV7C01sxN9J>

mARK,

Thanks for saving me the time of pointing out what is wrong here. The only 
fair comparison is a print from a digital file with a darkroom print, I hope 
both made by skilled printers. Otherwise you put the film at a disadvantage.

Bill Pearce

-----Original Message----- 
From: Mark Rabiner
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 11:57 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution

Aren't we comparing a  digital scanner against a digital camera?
I don't think its a real film to digital comparison without a high end drum
scan or at least a scan from one of those Hasselblad Flextight X1 Scanners
which cost the same as a used Chevy Nova.


On 4/12/14 12:45 AM, "Howard Ritter" <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:

> Oh, I absolutely agree. The film images in my repertoire that please me 
> the
> most don?t depend on resolution to do so (sometimes not even focus ;-).
> For example, the images of the skateboarders in London (link just now 
> posted)
> would not be improved in the least by tack-sharp resolution, any more than 
> by
> a shutter speed that would have frozen the boarder in mid-air.
>
> Marginal detail does way less to degrade an image well seen and captured 
> than
> the best detail can possibly improve a mediocre one.
>
> As a geek, as well as realizing that many applications do benefit from 
> however
> great a degree of resolution can be achieved, I just wanted to look at how 
> our
> technologies stacked up, both within themselves and compared to each 
> other.
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Shoot film for certain qualities lacking in digital, whatever they may 
>> be,
>> but chasing tangible qualities such as resolution is probably a loss 
>> cause.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)
Reply from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Comparing film and digital resolution)