Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I concur My experience is transforming two lenses myself using cheap nikon mounts from the bay. Worked well, so long as I used the nikon ;-) Nearly forgot - the transformation is reversible, which I plan to do for use on the fuji as I have the adaptor for my Ang?nieux. If you go the Leitax road, be sure to order the ones with chips - Canon metering is unreliable without I'm told. Amities Philippe Le 9 avr. 14 ? 21:30, Jayanand Govindaraj a ?crit : > Wayne, > If you do not mind a semi-permanent, but reversible, adaptation this > might > be the best solution. I have one lens, the 100mm macro adapted for > Nikon > mount, and I know a few more who have done this adaptation and we > use the > lenses with little or no problem. To be fair, I know of no one who > has used > the Leica to Canon adapters: > > http://www.leitax.com/Leica-lens-for-Canon-cameras.html > > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Wayne Serrano > <wayneserrano at earthlink.net>wrote: > >> Dear Lugger, >> >> I have a question for anyone using R lenses on EOS cameras. >> Currently I >> have a Rayqual Leica R-EOS adapter and there is a bit of rotational >> play >> when mounted, have others experienced this as well. I also wanted >> to ask if >> anyone has used the Novaflex EOS/LER adapter and could you share your >> observations. I might have to replace the Rayqual adapter and I am >> looking >> for something stronger. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Wayne >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE