Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Howard, My only experience has been using an imagesetter for making films for pt/pd printing (ancient technology, not good) and inkjet films for same (borderline OK for pt/pd, not for silver really). I'm sure people like Salgado have more advanced procedures available. But, it is a good question. My grandchildren will probably ask, what was wi-fi and why did grandpa need a separate device of some kind for the internet? I would probably look into dark storage for an inkjet print with non-destructive inks. Just a good letter-sized print will probably produce a great wall-sized reproduction 100 years from now. Ken On 3/26/2014 5:17 PM, Howard Ritter wrote: > The more I read and think about the transient nature of digital recording, > and the inevitable loss of our digital photos as recording media become > obsolete, I wonder about how to preserve my best work. I can personally > transfer files from, say, my hard disk to whatever medium replaces it, > using wifi in order to avoid obsolescence of connectors etc?at least as > long as wifi protocols remain backward-compatible. I know it's sheer > vanity to think even my kids and their children would have any interest in > seeing pictures from 50 or 100 years, let alone anyone else in the future > world, but which of us isn't driven to some extent by vanity? > > It seems to me that the best way to back up a digital photo in at least > acceptably faithful form would be to print it on film (idea not original > with me of course). The most accurate and at the same time most > bulletproof way would be to print the R, G, and B components of a digital > file each on its own frame of silver-based monochrome film, but that might > be over the top except for the most important archival purposes of the > most exceptional pictures. I'd think that printing at maximal resolution > on a K/F'chrome emulsion (as long as they remain available) or a > silver-based K/F'color emulsion would be practical and serve the purpose > well. I make the assumption that there will always be a way to convert a > film image to the digital du jour. Preserving the emulsions then is its > own separate task, but maybe more easily accomplished than preserving a > digital file. I could see doing this with the best few hundred of my > photos that (IMHO) have some value other than family or temporary > significance if the price is reasonable. > > Questions: has any LUGger actually done this or heard of its being done? > Is anyone making consumer film printers any longer? I remember them from > 25 or 30 years ago but a quick Google didn't turn up anything except what > looks like industrial stuff for maybe for producing film for movie > theaters. Is there a commercial service that will make 35mm film prints of > digital files? > > ?howard > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information