Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2014/03/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M2/HP5 and Monochrom comparison
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:39:05 -0700
References: <CAEFt+w9R02MDeW-_4Jt07UCK_5PABdHNBb9iaHMedw1hSdL-Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-HA=bhz-h=K3sO+eFr3NJoDiWZaivUNZt53_eOMdEHpvg@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOWu8wHxnUr4QN=KfJghAf2mn-W=nBsV6NUGN7wWHN4ynA@mail.gmail.com>
At least it's Apple to Apple to compare two set of badly processed images
then :-)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> That HP5+ looks just as badly processed as the MM files . . .
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
--
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
In reply to:
Message from dankhong at gmail.com (Dan Khong) ([Leica] M2/HP5 and Monochrom comparison)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M2/HP5 and Monochrom comparison)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] M2/HP5 and Monochrom comparison)