[Leica] DXOMark

[msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)]

it looks like sony is now making cmos for both hassi and phase one. i
wonder if leica will tap into that or go with another unknown small company
for the next rev of leica s

  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:

> I agree.  DXO has never liked anything Leica.  I don't trust them at all.
>
> Tina
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:30 AM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > dxo mark test criteria in general dont' like canon and leica stuff. when
> u
> > look @ a camera, u need to look @ the system and dxo does not do that. i
> > did get a s2 system and its quite nice.
> >
> >   -------------------------------------
> >   regards, mehrdad
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
> > earthlink.net
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Jayanand Govindaraj
> > >
> > > >>>
> > > I know it is not everything, but this might be of some interest:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Leica-S-sensor-review-Consummate-performer/Leica-S-vs-Phase-One-IQ180-Digital-Back-vs-Pentax-645D
> > > <<<
> > >
> > > Some discussion of the DxO numbers here:
> > >
> > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=87679.0
> > >
> > > Doug Herr
> > > Birdman of Sacramento
> > > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tina Manley
> http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>