Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DXOMark
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:30:30 -0800
References: <7410639.1393933137380.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

dxo mark test criteria in general dont' like canon and leica stuff. when u
look @ a camera, u need to look @ the system and dxo does not do that. i
did get a s2 system and its quite nice.

  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
earthlink.net>wrote:

> Jayanand Govindaraj
>
> >>>
> I know it is not everything, but this might be of some interest:
>
>
> http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Leica-S-sensor-review-Consummate-performer/Leica-S-vs-Phase-One-IQ180-Digital-Back-vs-Pentax-645D
> <<<
>
> Some discussion of the DxO numbers here:
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=87679.0
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] DXOMark)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] DXOMark)