Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2014/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:29:29 +0000
References: <CF2BB9E0.185C5%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5321466E-C881-40C2-AB08-4C66A30B3654@gmail.com> <CAFfkXxsWcCic2qhJegHpoerEnFh1ZB7zm6_47qHdVhUkn9hGww@mail.gmail.com> <2B9DDEAB-D9F4-4E7F-B0CD-663F5090D7D7@gmail.com>, <3F24E644-A878-4172-AF84-EEEDBBAF40DC@gmail.com>
I have not seen, never mind used, an A7(R). I have read on every photo web
site I read some people being very unhappy with <50mm RF lenses on them,
however some are happy so I guess depends on subject and level of personal
requirements/taste/preference/fussiness etc
john
________________________________________
On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Jim Gmail <jplaurel at gmail.com> wrote:
Aren't there a lot if reported issues with adapted lenses? The Leica M
primes, at least, seem to perform much better on the M240 than on the A7.
where is this proven?
Steve Barbour
Sent from my iPhone
Replies:
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Laurel (gmail)) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from jplaurel at gmail.com (Jim Gmail) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT - Sony Alpha 7R)