Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which one?
From: lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:43:18 +0100
References: <8D0F4C011490636-1554-1AB0E@webmail-m242.sysops.aol.com>
 
Larry,

Thank you for your time and those of your consulting panel!

I prefer too the 38615, I think this give the most realistic image

Cheers
Lluis

El 10/02/2014, a las 22:42, lrzeitlin at aol.com escribi?:

> Lluis,
> I showed your images to my small consulting panel (i.e. wife, son and 
> daughter in law, daughter and son in law). They agreed with the majority 
> of responders in the LUG that --615 is the better picture. But they also 
> concluded that --615+1 is the most realistic. The conclusion seems to be 
> based on the pattern of sunlight and shadow. The faces in --615 seem to be 
> artificially lightened, almost as if they were dodged in and the shadow 
> pattern on the walk does not appear to be quite right given the backlight. 
> The third picture --615BN looks almost as if it was illuminated from the 
> front with a fill flash yet there is no corresponding back shadow. Totally 
> unrealistic.
> Larry Z
> 
> 
> 
> Please take a look to these three version and let me know which one do you 
> prefer, if any?
> 
> &lt;http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615+1.jpg.html&gt;
> 
> &lt;http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615.jpg.html&gt;
> 
> &lt;http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615BN.jpg.html&gt;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Which one?)