Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Which one?
From: lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:42:01 -0500 (EST)
 
 Lluis,
I showed your images to my small consulting panel (i.e. wife, son and 
daughter in law, daughter and son in law). They agreed with the majority of 
responders in the LUG that --615 is the better picture. But they also 
concluded that --615+1 is the most realistic. The conclusion seems to be 
based on the pattern of sunlight and shadow. The faces in --615 seem to be 
artificially lightened, almost as if they were dodged in and the shadow 
pattern on the walk does not appear to be quite right given the backlight. 
The third picture --615BN looks almost as if it was illuminated from the 
front with a fill flash yet there is no corresponding back shadow. Totally 
unrealistic.
Larry Z



Please take a look to these three version and let me know which one do you 
prefer, if any?

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615+1.jpg.html>

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615.jpg.html>

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/20140205_L1038615BN.jpg.html>
Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Which one?)