Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments)
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:08:46 -0800
References: <20311681.1384656112852.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAAsXt4MAmZcmUc8ZNGN2acoD-VuD=cbSUh34wQdirz9nwD+uWw@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0E10F26@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

You would have been sopping! But then again, in the ocean waters off
Hawaii, that ain't such a bad thing?
:-)


On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 7:42 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> I find it odd using it as a chimney finder, does not work the same as a
> waist level finder (even though it is many years since I used one) - also
> with fussy lenses I do get sharper (better focussed) images than using the
> RF, shame I prefer using the RF ;-)
>
> john
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > I used the EVF on the M for the first time last week. Was with the 21mm
> and
> > replaced the external 21mm finder. It had several advantages over the
> > external 21mm finder:
> > *   Framing was EXACT!
> > *   Could see exactly what was in focus and adjust accordingly (using
> > shutter half-depressed)
> > *   And best of all, you can tilt it up so that the camera can be close
> to
> > the ground allowing you to really get a perspective you used to have to
> lie
> > down for Downside was a slight delay between depressing the shutter and
> > the shutter firing, but I got used to that...
> >
> > Here are a couple of the results; not the best images, but I don't blame
> the
> > EVF for that!
> > www.rgaphoto.com/21mmEVF
> >
> > Really fun using it as a chimney finder; up to my calves in waves, so I
> don't
> > think I could have gotten these without it other than guessing and with a
> > horizon bubble level in the hot shoe..
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Doug Herr
> > <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>wrote:
> >
> > > FRANK DERNIE wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>
> > > If you want accurate framing you will need a reflex camera or look at
> > > the sensor output either via the screen on the back or an EVF, whether
> > > you like it or not!
> > > <<<
> > >
> > > I agree... and even if it were possible to make the M frame lines 100%
> > > accurate at the focussed distance parallax would make the foreground
> > > and background and the spatial relationships between foreground,
> > > subject and background inaccurate.  For 100% accuracy a minimum of TTL
> > > viewing is required.
> > >
> > >
> > > Doug Herr
> > > Birdman of Sacramento
> > > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments))
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments))
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments))