[Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question

[hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)]

This is interesting, reading the differing impressions. I think that
everyone responding agrees that the environment is an essential part of the
story, Yet I'm alone in thinking that the second does that every bit as
well. Take a look at what portion of the first's background that is still
in the second. I don't see any more story lost by the closer framing and
the second has more engagement with the people. They are the subjects after
all.
No wrong answer of course, just preferences and interpretations of the
content and context effect on the story.


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 2 November 2013 06:04, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:

> it's the first for its environmental content
>
> ric
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 1:35 PM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> 
> wrote:
>
> > I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my
> daughter's place.
> >
> > I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved
> "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they
> spontaneously agreed to.
> >
> > So my question now is which one do you think works better if either
> does. And why svp.
> >
> > a)
> >
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
> >
> > or b)
> >
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg
> >
> > Thank you in anticipation.
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> >
> > One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to
> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
> > NO ARCHIVE
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>