Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:35:08 +0100
 
I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my  
daughter's place.

I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved  
"immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they  
spontaneously agreed to.

So my question now is which one do you think works better if either  
does. And why svp.

a)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg

or b)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg

Thank you in anticipation.

Philippe


One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Reply from j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question - THANKS and no conclusion ...)
Reply from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)