Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes. The 24x36 sensor limit is imposed by our investment in glass as opposed to sensor technology. -Lew Schwartz On Oct 22, 2013 3:07 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > I think there will be a limit on what is useful to fit on a 24mm x 36mm > sensor. 36MP already means that diffraction starts about f9, lenses need to > be very good (why Zeiss and Nikon are releasing new more expensive lenses) > and technique needs to be very good to get the best out. I have seen a > couple of people claim that the 24MP M and Sony RX1 give better (sharper?) > results than the D800E. > > Finally who needs more MP on a 'small' sensor? 24MP upwards will make a > decent sized print, if you are often making very large prints then, as in > the film days, a larger sensor will be the way to go.... > > john > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > Anyone know if there's a limit to the mp count for a full frame sensor? > 36 > > for the new A7R is very impressive. Are there any gotcha's re image > quality > > vs count, ie is there a count above which quality won't improve? > > > > -Lew Schwartz > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >