Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] X Pro Question
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:04:22 -0400

The compact folding wooden field cameras have a  compact lens system made by
Fujinon  "C" (compact, lightweight lenses)   Which are a first choice neck
in neck with Nikon and Schneider and Rodenstock.
The Fuji's have a tiny size and are lightweight and are ideal for such view
camera field use. More so than its competition I think.
 Kerry L. Thalmann is the go to guy for this stuff and he's  from Portland
Oregon which is where I'm from though I've never met him.
http://www.thalmann.com/largeformat/fujinon.htm

By the way my only large format lens is a Fujinon W 210mm f5.6 lens for my
Calumet Cambo NX.


On 8/24/13 10:05 PM, "Bob Adler" <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> I believe Fuji MFD lenses are only on the Hasselblad system. They are doing
> a good job with Cine lenses too.
> 
> But "technical camera" medium format (Cambo, Alpa, ArcaSwiss, Horseman,
> Sinar, Linhof) is currently dominated by Rodenstock and Schneider lenses
> made specifically for digital. Mamiya (PhaseOne) DSLR is, umm, Mamiya and
> the S is Leica..
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> The Fuji lenses were/are nothing to be embarrassed about using they were
>> able performers which could to be a bit on the optically inspired side in 
>> a
>> few cases.  They were exceedingly above average.
>> Avedon used them on his 8x10 view cameras.
>> Using the term  "Legendary"  on the Fuji glass on the folders I think not.
>> You want "legendary" you shot with a Rolleiflex with a Carl Zeiss
>> Oberkochen
>> Planar 2.8/80mm, and Schneider Xenotar 2.8/80mm,
>> Or a Tessar even. Or a 3.5. People claiming the Fuji's exceeded this glass
>> had their heads in the sand.
>> 
>> Nowadays in digital medium format Fuji is taking a new prominence and may
>> be
>> exceeding in some areas some of this now almost thought of as "vintage"
>> glass. That fact that it really is possible to optimize glass for digital
>> use is a key reason.
>> 
>> On 8/24/13 11:47 AM, "Jefffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> The Fuji medium format Texas Leicas were legendary for their sharp
>> lenses.
>>> Fuji didn't disappoint with the Xpro lenses.
>>> 
>>> Jeffery
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 24, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The 35mm X lens from Fuji is probably the sharpest lens I have ever
>> used. It
>>>> has been computed to exactly match the camera and the crop factor it is
>>>> designed for: it has no need to be a compromise between a film lens and
>> a
>>>> digital lens. IMHO when you are shooting with the Fuji X-Pro1 you forget
>>>> about the fact that it is a 1.5x crop. You just know the scope of the
>> lenses
>>>> that you use.
>>>> 
>>>> Gerry
>>>> 
>>>> Gerry Walden
>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>>>> www.gwpics.com
>>>> 
>>>> On 24 Aug 2013, at 06:18, David Ching <davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Have you tried the Fuji 35mm lens considered the best lens by many?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Your point about Leica M lenses being compromised is very interesting.
>> The
>>>>> view that there are lenses for digital and for film holds true for you
>> then.
>>>>> I do own both the Rokkor M 40mm and 90mm. As they film lenses?
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do feel about the crop factor of the Fuji? Perhaps this
>> exaggerates the
>>>>> quality of the lenses. Until we get a FF Fuji, it seems unfair to
>> somehow
>>>>> "discount" Leica M lenses or compare them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Always read your articles with much respect.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> David Ching
>>>>> 
>>>>> H.P. Tel. no.: +84 904684321 (Vietnam)
>>>>>                   : +65 92321098 (Singapore)
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] X Pro Question)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] X Pro Question)