Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PS/LR improvements forever?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:30:57 -0400
References: <CAFuU78dSQF0RvuGh_meusS-vbchBA9pmCYjv68CS6eMRicCm2w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1AjVD_+DDE=Zk+JHaFqX5_Aa-+RZLxTTfh3DNsT-M3w3w@mail.gmail.com> <307F75AA-C5EC-4378-B6B6-DA786C988CA6@gmail.com>

Yes, they are a layer in CC.  Very handy.

Tina


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rina,
> When you do RAW edits in LR and then do an Edit In CC from LR, do the LR
> RAW edits show up as a filter layer in CC that can be adjusted (such as
> decreasing/increasing clarity)?
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
>
> > I've tried the Camera Shake filter and it can significantly improve a
> > slightly blurred photo.  It works with film and digital images. Now I
> have
> > to go back through my files and rescue all of those that I have given one
> > star because of slight blurring!  I really like the Camera Raw filter
> that
> > is available in PSCC.  You can edit a photo straight from LR into PSCC
> and
> > apply the Camera Raw filter to get all of the controls that you have in
> > Adobe Camera Raw.  Just works a lot better with a LR workflow.  I haven't
> > investigated much more that is new but there are several improvements.
>  As
> > far as what more they can do, who knows!  Anything that would help me
> > adjust all of these scans automatically would be welcome.  Improvements
> in
> > stitching and stacking multi-exposures will certainly be coming.
> > Improvements in shadow detail and highlight rescue without looking like
> > HDR would be interesting also.  I'm sure they will come up with something
> > to keep tempting us to continue the subscription.
> >
> > Tina
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In view of the new subscription format, I'm wondering at its value for
> >> those of us who are exclusively still photographers. It seems to me that
> >> both products have already exceeded anything a former wet darkroom dude
> >> such as myself is even capable of imagining .... so what more could I
> ask
> >> for than the capabilities I already have in these programs? What more
> does
> >> anyone want? Anything specific?
> >>
> >> (I do have to admit that Adobe PS/CC just announced the ability to
> reduce
> >> blurred images due camera shake - a capability built into many digital
> >> cameras (but not M9's or MM's). I'll be exploring this asap if I decide
> to
> >> go for the upgrade. )
> >>
> >> -Lew Schwartz
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tina Manley
> > http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley
http:// <http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/>www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] PS/LR improvements forever?)
In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] PS/LR improvements forever?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] PS/LR improvements forever?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] PS/LR improvements forever?)