Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] An Observation
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:49:30 -0500
References: <6318F0058B9F4FA8864EC388EA7601EA@jimnichols> <CAFuU78dcQS72zqmf_a==rC34-a2=zHf9r+9RmEQ1DZi+5HJ9VA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, Lew.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lew Schwartz" <lew1716 at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Cc: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus at thomasclausen.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] An Observation


> Yes,
>
> -Lew Schwartz
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> When I post images made with Zuiko lenses, I post to the OM Gallery. 
>> When
>> I have images made with Leica lenses, I post to the LUG Gallery.  My 
>> email
>> messages announcing these images go to both lists.
>>
>> I normally find that images posted to the OM Gallery get twice as many
>> viewings as those posted to the LUG Gallery.  This is puzzling to me.
>>
>> Do OM listers browse the galleries, independent of recent posting 
>> messages?
>>
>> Or, AG, could there be a different tracking algorithm in play here?
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] An Observation)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] An Observation)