Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Alternatives to Adobe rentware
From: scottgregory at mac.com (Scott Gregory)
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:51:27 -0400
References: <9317226F-B6A1-41F4-939E-FB47A0BA1A18@gmail.com>

I just purchased CS6 about three months before Adobe announced the changes. 
I'm not pleased as a small consumer so will use CS6, Lightroom and and plan 
on getting Aperture which I see a lot of pros are using these days as well. 
I'm not a heavy manipulator preferring to do all I can in camera. 


Scott


On 2013-07-06, at 11:25 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:

> It will be interesting to see how the non-pro membership copes with the 
> move to renting Adobe software by the month or year. Inasmuch as most 
> plug-ins are designed for Adobe software, our hands are sort of tied on 
> this one. I have a Mac and access to Aperture 3.x, which works with most 
> plug-ins. Inasmuch as I'm a member of Lynda.com, I can peruse the Aperture 
> tutorials and see if switching to Aperture is going to be enough for me 
> (my needs are far less than professional needs).
> 
> Jeffery
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Alternatives to Adobe rentware)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Alternatives to Adobe rentware)