Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:37 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2013, at 4:27 PM, John McMaster wrote: > >> You do George, despite what I said about there being little difference in >> results (for my usage) between the M9 and M I have not shot with the M9 >> in the weeks since the M arrived.... > > I have followed everything you've said about the various camera bodies. > I wonder if you currently see any reason to keep the M9 - other than as > fine backup body? I think I mean to ask this: Does the M9 have any feature, advantage, characteristic, or positive idiosyncrasy that the M did not bring forward? Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist