Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No idea on the MTBF figures, may well be so. However OS in the same array is what concerns me the most. Without that failure of a scratch drive is of no importance at all. Tina is very unlikely to set up any kind of RAID in any case so the point is moot for what she want s to do and how she wants to go about it (having a company build it for her) as a turnkey solution. I'm definitely out of here ;-0 *Breathe in, breathe out, move on* -- Jimmy Buffett Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 10 June 2013 00:51, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote: > geof the mtbf of the ssd drives are very very low since there are no moving > parts and much much better than hard drives, there is really > no difference between using three separate drives when one fails, u loose > all. the best way is raid 10 which is mirroring and striping , i use > striped sdd for my os drives and every time something is updated, i do an > image back up, data site on raid 5 disk system. my lr library and scratch > disk are on the striped ssd and when i do major work , i back it up the the > raid drive. > ------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >