Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yep 6400. Not 64000. I made that mistake yet again. Sound like off the deep end but its two more stops than 1600. I shot a ton of Neopan 1600 and color neg films at 1600 and it was often not good enough for plenty of dark situations. The 6400 is well appreciated. And a thing which is a reality at 24x36mm but at 18x24 which is a 1.5 crop. If there was full frame camera out their which cant handle 6400 I'd be interested it which it could be. And I'd doubt it. On 6/2/13 4:24 PM, "Philippe Amard" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: > Would 10 links at 6400 be alright with you? I'd throw in one more link > of the same for good measure ;-) > > Amities > Philippe > > > Le 2 juin 13 ? 18:39, George Lottermoser a ?crit : > >> Do tell and link to "viable 64,000" results from M or any other >> camera... >> >> a note off the iPad, George >> >> On Jun 1, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Viable iso 64,000 results has been around for quite a few years now >>> on >>> numerous full frame DSLR cameras from a half dozen different >>> companies are >>> these results here any better? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible > to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. > NO ARCHIVE > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/