Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:21:26 -0400

Absolutely! Just use the word "child" or "baby" and our rights fly right out
the picture window!


On 5/30/13 10:44 AM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:

> 
> On May 30, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
> 
>> It is about a woman who recognized her kid in the picture, and worried
>> about her baby.
> 
> Yet - I've not seen this "recognizable child" photograph; and I've looked.
> Have you (or anyone else) seen the "offending photograph?"
> Just curious about this particular point.
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)