[Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M

[photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)]

On the other hand, the CL, which did take M lenses, did not have M in its 
name ;-)

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On May 28, 2013, at 9:48 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> The X2 and D-Lux6 had no right to M nomenclature either....
> 
> john
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> 
>> On May 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Vick Ko wrote:
>> 
>>> Is that an autofocus lens?
>>> Vick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 28/05/2013 11:18 AM, mehrdad wrote:
>>>> well looks like i was right! here is the minilux zoom,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/first-image-of-the-leica-m-mini/
>> 
>> If that lens does not come off the body
>> with an M mount bayonet
>> 
>> calling it an M mini becomes a very bad joke; as there's nothing M about 
>> it;
>> nothing whatsoever.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>