Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Or maybe they just did not test certain lenses. I just compared how much the rear element protrudes with my various lenses. The Leica 2.5/35mm Summarit (which is not listed at all) protrudes less than the 50mm Summilux (which is listed). On the other hand, the 4/21mm CV is listed as YES in the LTM mount but not listed at all in the M mount (the one I have). I think I will need to try for myself (carefully). Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On May 18, 2013, at 6:39 PM, FRANK DERNIE wrote: > > BTW the lens compatibility list is, I think, a mechanical compatibility > list some lenses just don't fit or clash with something in the camera > body. The 6 memories in the adapter have to be set up to suit one can > adjust between 7 barrel distortion settings a colour shading matrix and > vignetting correction or increase, 4 do not allow focal length to be > changed and the other two do. > > The shutter delay with the adaptor is to all intents and purposes nil. > > Frank Dernie >