Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 06:14:50 -0400

For those who are " thinking about my order for the M240 vs. the X series."
Kind of sounds like one is in the middle of really financing a seven grand
full frame M but then somehow looking over at the $1400 1.5 crop Fuji in the
same breath?
Here's what I came up with:
$7000 - $1400 = $5600.00 savings
And also:
$7000/$1400 = 5.0

So if you last minute having saved seven grand for the M  but then get the X
instead you have $5600 burning a hole in your back pocket that can buy you
exactly four more X's.
That's quite a discrepancy of dreams!
... Or an extra lens and a trip around the world.

Its like "oh boy I get to finally buy that Rolls Royce now but maybe that
Honda Civic will also get me there?"
Or as we say in the US of A:  apples and oranges.
Or lets say you saved up to get a Harley motorcycle but then got a tuna fish
sandwich instead? Lots of left over here too for extras:
Tomatoes
Cheese.
Lettuce.
Pickles
Rye bread.

I'm afraid I'm just not seeing the overlap between M dreams and X dreams.
To me they just don't belong in the same rapid eye movement cycle.
At very least there's a full tuna on rye separating them.


On 5/16/13 9:51 PM, "Don Dory" <don.dory at gmail.com> wrote:

> If we are talking about the Fuji X series, the 35mm 1.4 is an excellent
> lens.  Pretty close focusing and very closely integrated with the "brains"
> of the XPro to be very low vignette and really pretty flat field.  Results
> at 1600 were very good noise wise.  Just my two cents thinking about my
> order for the M240 vs the X series.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at 
> summaventures.com>wrote:
> 
>> Voigt 40/1.4 at $449? I think you've said that you have the M-adapter.
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>> On 16/05/2013 19:27, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>>> My guess is that they wanted to sell enough X100and now X100s before
>> releasing the lens on its own.
>>> Jayanand
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> On 16-May-2013, at 11:46 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On May 16, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at 
>>>> gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Well, I have that, and that is what I generally use, but a fast 35mm
>> would be perfect for the streets!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> patience,  coming soon from several sources
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Jayanand
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 16-May-2013, at 11:27 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> There's the Fujinon 18 - 55 zoom.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 15/05/2013 11:09, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>>>>>>> Way too expensive compared to Fuji's excellent offerings. They cannot
>>>>>>> be worth that much of a premium. In fact I just ordered the Fuji
>> 14mm,
>>>>>>> after seeing the disparity in price with the Zeiss. I am paying the
>>>>>>> equivalent of US$750 for the 14mm. Now, if they had the sense to
>>>>>>> release a 23mm - the gaping hole in Fuji's line up - it might have
>>>>>>> been different, I would have been sorely tempted.
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Jayanand
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at 
>>>>>>> me.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just seen these lovely lenses from Zeiss. Bit pricey but should be
>> superb!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Carl_Zeiss_Touit_12mm_f2-8/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Gerry
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Gerry Walden
>>>>>>>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>>>>>>>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>>>>>>>> www.gwpics.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>> information
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ===========================================================
>>>>>> Dr Peter Dzwig
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> ===========================================================
>> Dr Peter Dzwig
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)