Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 07:32:18 +0200
References: <CAF8hL-HJuiPn_SoqUvfm=HpGStA2NiB0Ftev+HPEae7G9oLMYA@mail.gmail.com>

Puny :-)

Actually, I too scan on an Epson flatbed, the V700, at its maximum optical 
resolution of 6400 dpi. I do wish I had a dedicated MF scanner, but given 
that I only shoot 10-20 rolls a year, I cannot justify the expense.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> This is really just a test to see if a commercial lab's processed 4x5 color
> neg has the color cast or not, and sure enough the colors are quite
> accurate. This means that my processing can be better still. I hope I can
> get the color cast problems resolved. I like the flexibility to shoot in
> color without the 6 steps needed to process slides...
> 
> In any case, just a quick and fast 3200 DPI scan with the Epson flatbed.
> Imagine what it looks like with a proper drum scan (not that this
> particular image is worth it).
> 
> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130405-Scanned-18.jpg
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)