Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:
From: jkfyao at gmail.com (Joseph Yao)
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:01:49 +0800
References: <B9188149-0D87-49FC-8D17-6D0E45E52936@acm.org> <2B4E44DA-B12F-447D-8D57-1F70B73133D0@frozenlight.eu> <1356078638.99316.YahooMailNeo@web87403.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <040801cddf9f$e28a9720$a79fc560$@gmail.com> <1356110884.23266.YahooMailNeo@web87402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99CD3825B@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Small world.  I also went to IC in 1983.

Joseph


On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:39 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> Punched cards were still in use at IC Mech Eng in 1982 (the year before I
> went there)......
>
> John - catching up
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Hi Piers,
> > your software could have been running alongside mine then, since I was at
> > IC!
> > Your card punching was much more onerous than ours though, at Imperial
> > there was a room with half a dozen punch machines we could use (as long
> as
> > there was one free).
> > Frank
> >
> > >
> > >1970-71?
> > >
> > >Me too, but in my last year at (high) school, taking an elective
> > >course. The school had something like 30 minutes each month on the
> > >Imperial College mainframe in London, which involved gathering together
> > >the punched cards from the class, sending down to London by Royal Mail,
> > >receiving back the print out which was then split out to each user. I
> > >should clarify that the cards were pre-semi-punched, meaning that the
> > >user had to use a pin to push out the chads from each row/column by hand
> > to code the desired character.
> > >
> > >It took a while to do one line of code, even after the time it took to
> > >learn the fundamentals of Fortran IV programming!
> > >
> > >And then it took a while to get the response back from the mainframe.
> > >
> > >By post.
> > >
> > >Two ways.
> > >
> > >(I guess that was half-duplex transmission!).
> > >
> > >I remember the impatient waiting for the print-out to come back, but my
> > >memory of reading it is very clear...
> > >
> > >XXX SYNTAX ERROR LINE 100 XXX
> > >
> > >The school later graduated to having its own ICL1900 (if memory serves)
> > >on site, long after I had left. Wouldn't have made any difference to my
> > >skill-level!
> > >
> > >Piers
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
In reply to: Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
Message from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Some artifacts at the Computer History Museum IMG:)