Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Jim. Is this better? http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/147801312 As a documentarian, I always hesitate to remove anything that was actually there, but I agree that those spots were only distractions and added nothing to the meaning of the photos. Tina On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>wrote: > These look fine color-wise. I would clone out the lint on the head of the > one on the right, and do a little cleanup of the wall on the upper left, > just to remove distractions. Little things can, at times, spoil the impact > of a fine image. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> > To: <MUGers at yahoogroups.com>; "lug" <lug at leica-users.org>; "paw" < > paw at micapeak.com>; "seephoto" <seephoto at micapeak.com>; "Olympus > Camera > Discussion" <olympus at thomasclausen.net> > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 5:47 PM > Subject: [Leica] IMG: Sisters with Cataracts > > > PESO: >> >> One more before I quit for the night: >> >> http://www.pbase.com/image/**147801312<http://www.pbase.com/image/147801312> >> >> This one has -20 on Vibrance and -15 on Saturation so you can imagine how >> saturated the original scan is! >> >> C&C greatly appreciated. >> >> Tina >> >> -- >> Tina Manley, ASMP >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> >> >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com