Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:44:03 -0600
References: <CCDC4726.26DCC%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Flash software, Mark, the presentation system.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9


>I Googled "Flash SW" and came up with ziltch. No clue.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
>> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:45:38 -0800
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
>> 
>> He meant Flash SW......  Not Flash-Light.
>> 
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at verizon.net
>> 
>> 
>> Wrong guy half my work is with flash at least before digital.
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)