Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:04:37 +0000
References: <20121128173812.RIOY29905.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> <9F112210-8ED3-4120-A835-10065D6E7E34@mac.com> <083567F2F26B4FEFA63C1984ADB148D7@syneticfeba505> <CAF8hL-E0NzJnXkwjz89k-tQB422qX5Bc0=JJccjKVXOkszGwwg@mail.gmail.com>
Only if shooting the same thing in the same way. I bought a 5x4 field camera
(a Zone VI) many years back, I thought that as all my shots were tripod
mounted Hasselblad that it would be better. I was wrong, never took a decent
shot with it!
john
-----Original Message-----
Chances are I will pick up a 4x5 to go with my 617 at some point and my
$500 lens will eat the lunch off the $10,000 Noctilux...
In reply to:
Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)