Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Peter Krogh told me that I should not use an enlarging lens on the Beseler slide duplicator when making in-camera dupes because it is flat-field. Not sure why but I'm now using the Leica Macro 100 and it gives good results, better than the enlarging lens (Rodenstock) that I tried first. Tina On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:18 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Sonny Carter wrote: > > > It's not crazy. Lots of people used to do just that. Most enlarging > > lenses are flat field though, since both the negative and the paper are > one > > dimensional for focus. But it will work. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > >> So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be the best > >> enlarging lens on earth? > > far from the "best enlarging lens on earth." > > The best enlarging lenses (and copy lenses) on earth > are designed as flat field and optimized for certain magnification ranges. > > A modern 50 or 35 mm Summicron "may" perform very well > as an enlarging lens > at a given focus distance and aperture; > though I doubt it would outperform the best modern, apo enlarging lenses; > aperture for aperture. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com