Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is this why X100 images compare favorably with those from digital M when seen on line, or is it because images viewed on line really can't be seen in enough detail to-be judged? Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8 at hotmail.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Subject: [Leica] Review of Fuji's new X-E1 with zoom lens. Date: Sun, Nov 11, 2012 10:12 am Mark. Back in film days, the Leica quality was always with the lens. All cameras could shoot the same film and vary the exposure the same way. The lenses made the difference. Now, with digital, there is one more variable between cameras. The sensor and firmware replace the universally available film. Leica has to get that part at least as good as the competition for the lenses to make the difference again. Hope they can do it with the M and CMOS. They are competing with the big boys who have big bucks and lots of years of experience. Aram -------------------------------------------------- > On 11 Nov, 2012, at 00:47, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> I don't think any of them will really come close though. >> They'll be smaller and lighter then an M. But the image quality will of >> >> the >> M will be plainly visible. >> Glaringly visible up from an APS- C camera. >> >> >> >> Mark William Rabiner >> Photography > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information