Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is not a matter of waste to use the profiles.... it is a waste of valuable resource ( time, support of current M owners, future of next generation of M buyers) to do the R before the M. The R solution, presumably, is to support the M Type 240 with R to M adapter. As to your question of how much correction doe s the 100 APO need? Probably none. Which is another reason to support M lenses that need the profile first.... Including the WATE. Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net As an R lens user on a Nikon, I don't find them a waste at all. I would love to give them a try to see what they can do for me. The profiles for my Nikon lenses improve things quite a bit. Not sure if that will be the case for R lenses. How much improvement does the 100 APO need anyway? Aram > I find that a waste. A ridiculous waste. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information