Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can't say from experience, however, the Noct + Monochrom would go where no photographer has gone before. ISO 10,000 for a Noct would be like ISO 20,000 for a Sumilux. And Erwin has written that the Noct, the older one, was quite good at smaller apertures when the occasion requires. You could almost do landscapes by starlight. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Sue Ryan" <scoutfinch at chartermi.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Subject: [Leica] Replacement equipment decisions after theft - insurance is doing right by me! Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2012 6:03 pm In a recent theft I lost my 10 month old M9 and last model Nocti F1 that I had coded. My insurance will replace the M9 with a new M9 or its cash value. They will replace my Nocti with a new, unused Nocti .95 at no out of pocket $ if I replace it through their supplier. For the same replacement cost of the Nocti, I could come close to getting the MM and a Summilux 50 ASPH 1.4. I already have an older 50 mm 'cron. I need opinions - if you had the choice having an M9 and a .95 Nocti, or an M9, MM and Summilux 50 ASPH, which would you choose? I'm not interested in the new M for several reasons, so don't throw that variable into the mix. Thanks in advance, Sue Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information