Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:52:05 +1200
References: <CAFuU78fDnU8PVFgH8nwKsFzEPm77vU_-0H9LHiG50txY9EJS+A@mail.gmail.com> <49E2D15BD1AA4D48A162CFF52611D9AD@billHP> <CAFuU78exZ+hBLfzQNZUU8OKZY5En01KUfSgxYtpt-h_ML9na+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAE3QcF79qP_Q=f7yGNs1Ybdg2L_W1pT9KjB=htciJbXX2ChbMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78dFW1dGcr8zKNnryhh-DmaMGjiX7ZN28QhCAjpx1=+jYw@mail.gmail.com>

If it works now it will work, after albeit maybe not for so many shots. As
Geoff says, others have tried it, you can downgrade to 1.76 again if
required.

john

-----Original Message-----

Just for clarification (this seems to have gone 'off' on this thread), I
don't mind if I get a warning; I'm trying to find out if the camera will
work with my 3rd party batteries or not.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> Bill and Lew if you do not want the camera to warn you about 
> unreliable battery power levels,  just don't upgrade.
> If you have never had a problem there is no benefit to upgrading 
> (there is no advertised image quality change). It is only about trying 
> to prevent write problems. As far as I can tell most people (including 
> me) never saw that problem anyway.
> I have not seen a single report thus far since official release of 
> earlier shutdown actually for whatever that's worth.
> If you do load the new firmware and wish to downgrade you can do so. 
> You just to run the setup from the current UPD (1.176) file again.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
>
> On 7 August 2012 14:46, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that you may get a warning, but that they will 
> > still work. If they're DOA, I'm screwed.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > This no aftermarket battery thing is a real pain. If they hadn't
> charged
> > > so much for something that is obviously available for much less, 
> > > they
> > could
> > > have saved money on writing special firmware. Not something that 
> > > makes
> me
> > > feel good about the manufacturers.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message----- From: Lew Schwartz
> > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 11:24 PM
> > > To: Leica Users Group
> > > Subject: [Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries
> > >
> > >
> > > Can anyone report from the field if the update will reject my 
> > > non-Leica batteries? Not looking forward to replacing them. Also, 
> > > will the Leica
> > only
> > > battery injunction be enforced on the MM and M10?
> > >
> > > 




Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] M9 firmware update and 3rd party batteries)