Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Portrait of Mom - 50/1.2
From: j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:30:56 +0200
References: <BLU139-DS1625AB6F593DDEB6905DB0B8C60@phx.gbl>

Beautiful portraits, I like n?2 particularly.Jean-Michel
 > From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com
> To: lug at leica-users.org; LeicaReflex at freelists.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:19:00 -0700
> Subject: [Leica] Portrait of Mom - 50/1.2
> 
> Dug out the 50/1.2 Nikon and strapped in on the D7000 for these.  They 
> were shot at 1.2, and 2 respectfully.  The f-stop does not record 
> accurately on the D7000 for this lens for some reason.  The lowest that 
> will show up is 2.0 and when stopping down, it always shows the next 
> smallest f-stop, so 2.0 shows as 2.8, 2.8 shows as 4.0, etc.  Not sure if 
> that can be adjusted.
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3135.jpg.html
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3130.jpg.html
> 
> Vanishing thin depth of field at 1.2. Been a while since I tried this lens 
> as my rate of accurately focused shots indoors was dismal, but there was 
> enough light coming through the window at Kidd Valley I think I got the 
> focus pretty good.
> 
> comments and criticism welcome.  View large.
> 
> Aram
> 
> Aram Langhans
> (Semi) Retired (retarded?) Science Teacher
> & Unemployed photographer
>  
> "The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself 
> would ever have dared dream."   James D. Watson 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          


Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] Portrait of Mom - 50/1.2)
In reply to: Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Portrait of Mom - 50/1.2)