Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:28:47 +1000
References: <000a01cd64aa$e31981d0$a94c8570$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <E5ABD291-F771-4593-B649-FF6AD1A7747E@mac.com>

Risking the wrath of Ted (but he's resting right now!) I would add for this
particular comparison a focus shift comparison might be instructive too.
Shoot one with each wide open in close, then stop down to say f/4.

Cheers,
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman



On 19 July 2012 07:20, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 18, 2012, at 1:02 AM, John McMaster wrote:
>
> > 24 hours and no replies, I guess nobody saw much difference in bokeh?
> There
> > were some where, side by side, the pre-asph was preferable but others
> where
> > that was reversed...
>
> This was the point I was alluding to a week or two ago.
> Each scene (subject / light) will be rendered slightly (or not so
> slightly) differently
> by each lens/sensor/film combination.
>
> And we can't have them all (at least I can't).
> So we get to know the gear we have;
> and make educated use of it to achieve our aesthetic goals.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos)