Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:02:17 +1200

24 hours and no replies, I guess nobody saw much difference in bokeh? There
were some where, side by side, the pre-asph was preferable but others where
that was reversed...

john

----Original Message-----

If anyone has, even temporarily, the ASPH and non-ASPH versions of the same
lens, I'd love to be able to compare identical shots taken with the two.

Herb

_____________________________________

I (unusually for me) carried a second lens today and tried for some things
to compare:

1) 2001 E46 50mm Summilux pre-asph, 6-bit and tweaked in Solms this year

2) 2010 50mm Summilux asph FLE, 6-bit

Shots at f1.4 or f4.0-f5.6 and lenses are mixed up between A and B. 
All handheld so not exactly same framing, sun was slightly variable but lens
were kept on same aperture.

http://johnmcmaster.com/lens/50lux

Open in new window (1200 pixels) to compare side by side and let me know
what you think.....

john




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos)
Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] (tech) Lens comparisons - 50mm Summilux - has photos)