Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Back to film!
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:15:25 -0500
References: <CC2B23AE.213DC%mark@rabinergroup.com>, <6B28F691-AA74-43EB-A7E2-4C42F28FD4ED@gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E988EC6BF3@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

As long as one of them is good.  I was hoping that an inexpensive drum 
scanner would appear. I lost interest after full frame digital came around.

Regards,

Jeffery
_________________
Jeffery Smith
Irish Channel, New Orleans, LA
www.400tx.com



On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:05 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> Doesn't mean that they are all good though. There is a new medium format 
> film scanner due in a few months, the current Pacific Image one is badly 
> regarded (and you have to cut 6x7 into single frames to scan). Given that 
> Nikon and Minolta had done the design and manufacturing of good scanners I 
> guess that there is only a small market which is why they stopped 
> production? Which in turn shows why the used prices for Nikon/Minolta film 
> scanners are still high.....
> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
> I have to admit to being surprised that there are still so many available. 
> I had very good results scanning 120 film with an HP flatbed scanner 10 
> years ago, and prices on those could only go down. Gaa! I remember buying 
> a B&W flatbed scanner in the early 90's (only opaque scanning, no 
> transparency), and it seems like it was about $500.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeffery
> 
> 
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> 22 different film scanners on the B&H site.
>> 70 flat beds.
>> There is a LUG myth that a scanner without the names Nikon or Minolta or
>> Hasselblad on it does not exist. And should be widely Ignored.
>> A " baseless fabric of a vision " [Tempest]
>> 
>> I think a film scanner made by a company such as "Pacific Image" just may 
>> be
>> able to scan film without shreading it. One made by them cost $1,399.00.
>> It's called the Pacific Image PrimeFilm 120 Multi-Format CCD Film Scanner.
>> They make a dedicated slide scanner which looks good to me for $479.95. 
>> I'll
>> take that one too please gift wrapped.
>> And they make Pacific Image PF7250U 35mm Film and Slide Scanner which cost
>> $269. A perfect stocking stuffer.
>> My next scanner would be one of these. Brand new. From Pacific Image.
>> And I can't be more specific than Pacific. I'm sure there are some worthy
>> ones from Atlantic.
>> But I'll stick with Pacific.
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012  Chris Saganich <csaganich at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'll continue using my Minolta DiMage untill that gives
>>>> out like the Polaroid Sprintscan before.  The real killer is software 
>>>> and
>>>> cable compatibility.
>>> =========================================================================
>>> What went wrong with the Sprintscan?  We are still using one with an old 
>>> Mac
>>> at the office.
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMG: Back to film!)